Auxiliary query commands to deploy predictive data models for queries in a networked computing platform

ABSTRACT

Various embodiments relate generally to data science and data analysis, computer software and systems, and network communications to interface among repositories of disparate datasets and computing machine-based entities configured to access datasets, and, more specifically, to a computing and data storage platform configured to provide one or more computerized tools to deploy predictive data models based on in-situ auxiliary query commands implemented in a query, and configured to facilitate development and management of data projects by providing an interactive, project-centric workspace interface coupled to collaborative computing devices and user accounts. For example, a method may include activating a query engine, implementing a subset of auxiliary instructions, at least one auxiliary instruction being configured to access model data, receiving a query that causes the query engine to access the model data, receiving serialized model data, performing a function associated with the serialized model data, and generating resultant data.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/985,705, filed on May 22, 2018, and titled “DYNAMIC COMPOSITE DATA DICTIONARY TO FACILITATE DATA OPERATIONS VIA COMPUTERIZED TOOLS CONFIGURED TO ACCESS COLLABORATIVE DATASETS IN A NETWORKED COMPUTING PLATFORM,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. THIS application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 10,346,429, issued on Jul. 9, 2019, and titled “MANAGEMENT OF COLLABORATIVE DATASETS VIA DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER NETWORKS,” U.S. Pat. No. 10,353,911, issued on Jul. 16, 2019, and titled “COMPUTERIZED TOOLS TO DISCOVER, FORM, AND ANALYZE DATASET INTERRELATIONS AMONG A SYSTEM OF NETWORKED COLLABORATIVE DATASETS,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/927,006 filed on Mar. 20, 2018, and titled “AGGREGATION OF ANCILLARY DATA ASSOCIATED WITH SOURCE DATA IN A SYSTEM OF NETWORKED COLLABORATIVE DATASETS,” all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

FIELD

Various embodiments relate generally to data science and data analysis, computer software and systems, and wired and wireless network communications to interface among repositories of disparate datasets and computing machine-based entities configured to access datasets, and, more specifically, to a computing and data storage platform configured to provide one or more computerized tools to deploy predictive data models based on in-situ auxiliary query commands implemented in a query, and configured to facilitate development and management of data projects by providing an interactive, project-centric workspace interface coupled to collaborative computing devices and user accounts.

BACKGROUND

Advances in computing hardware and software have fueled exponential growth in the generation of vast amounts of data due to increased computations and analyses in numerous areas, such as in the various scientific and engineering disciplines. Also, advances in conventional data storage technologies provide an ability to store an increasing amounts of generated data. Moreover, different computing platforms and systems, different database technologies, and different data formats give rise to “data silos” that inherently segregate and isolate datasets.

While conventional approaches are functional, various approaches are not well-suited to significantly overcome the difficulties of data silos. Organizations, including enterprises, continue strive to understand, manage, and productively use large amounts of enterprise data. For example, consumers of enterprise organizations have different levels of skill and experience in using analytic data tools. Data scientists typically create complex data models using sophisticated analysis application tools, whereas other individuals, such as executives, marketing personnel, product managers, etc., have varying levels of skill, roles, and responsibilities in an organization. The disparities in various analytic data tools, reporting tools, visualization tools, etc., continue to frustrate efforts to improve interoperability and usage of large amounts of data.

Further, various data management and analysis applications, such as query programming language applications and data analytic applications, may not be compatible for use in a distributed data architecture. As such, data practitioners generally may be required to intervene manually to apply derived formulaic data models to datasets.

Thus, what is needed is a solution for facilitating techniques to optimize data operations applied to datasets, without the limitations of conventional techniques.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments or examples (“examples”) of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings:

FIG. 1 is a diagram depicting an example of a query engine configured to implement auxiliary query commands to apply at least a subset of a dataset to a predictive data model, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 2 is a diagram depicting an example of a stack configured to facilitate functionalities of an auxiliary query layer and a data project layer thereon, according to some examples;

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram depicting an example of implementing a query engine to deploy predictive data models in situ, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram depicting an example of an auxiliary query command configured to process functionality of a predictive data model, according to some examples;

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram depicting an example of implementing an auxiliary query command to deploy predictive data models during query execution, according to some embodiments;

FIG. 6 is a diagram depicting a collaborative dataset consolidation system configured to facilitate implementation of an auxiliary query command by multiple collaborative computing systems, according to some examples;

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting an example of implementing an auxiliary query command collaboratively to redeploy predictive data models during requests to run queries, according to some embodiments; and

FIG. 8 illustrates examples of various computing platforms configured to provide various functionalities to any of one or more components of a collaborative dataset consolidation system, according to various embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments or examples may be implemented in numerous ways, including as a system, a process, an apparatus, a user interface, or a series of program instructions on a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network where the program instructions are sent over optical, electronic, or wireless communication links. In general, operations of disclosed processes may be performed in an arbitrary order, unless otherwise provided in the claims.

A detailed description of one or more examples is provided below along with accompanying figures. The detailed description is provided in connection with such examples, but is not limited to any particular example. The scope is limited only by the claims, and numerous alternatives, modifications, and equivalents thereof. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the described techniques may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the examples has not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description.

FIG. 1 is a diagram depicting an example of a query engine configured to implement auxiliary query commands to apply at least a subset of a dataset to a predictive data model, according to some embodiments. Diagram 100 depicts an example of a collaborative dataset consolidation system 110 that may be configured to consolidate one or more datasets to form collaborative datasets. The collaborative datasets provide, for example, a canonical dataset in association with a collaborative data project directed to analyzing collaborative datasets in view of a particular project objective or purpose. A collaborative dataset, according to some non-limiting examples, is a set of data that may be configured to facilitate data interoperability over disparate computing system platforms, architectures, and data storage devices. Examples of collaborative datasets may include, but are not limited to, data catalogs or any type of repository that is used to aggregate and perform various computing functions on one or more datasets using input, for example, from users, either individually or those in networked collaboration. Further, a collaborative dataset may also be associated with data configured to establish one or more associations (e.g., metadata) among subsets of dataset attribute data for datasets and multiple layers of layered data, whereby attribute data may be used to determine correlations (e.g., data patterns, trends, etc.) among the collaborative datasets.

Collaborative dataset consolidation system 110 is shown to include a query engine 104, a data project controller 106, a dataset ingestion controller 108, and a collaboration manager 170, and may include other structures and/or functionalities (not shown). Query engine 104, which may be configured to store, modify, and query data in accordance with query commands (or instructions) of a query programming language, may include an auxiliary query engine 105. In this example, auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to perform auxiliary functions adapted to be compatible with a query programming language. Further, auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to process auxiliary query commands to supplement a query programming language. In some examples, an auxiliary query command may be compatible with a set of query commands of a query programming language, and auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to process multiple classes of auxiliary query commands. For example, an auxiliary query command may be compatible with (or may supplement) a structured query language (“SQL”), a SPARQL protocol and RDF query language (“SPARQL”), and the like

According to some examples, one class of auxiliary query commands may be configured to implement data representing a predictive data model as a query is performed. In operation, auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to detect an auxiliary query command configured to implement a predictive data model, identify a specific predictive data model, and apply data from or at one or more datasets 132 of repository 130 to a predictive data model to generate resultant data. To illustrate, consider an example in which query engine 104 may be running a query with which auxiliary query engine 105 may detect an auxiliary query command. In some examples, an auxiliary query command may specify an identified predictive data model. In turn, auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to transmit via a network 141 data 113 a representing a request to access the identified predictive data model (e.g., based on an identifier specifying the predictive data model). In the example shown, auxiliary query engine 105 may transmit request data 113 a to fetch data representing a predictive data model, such a trained data model 122 stored in repository 120. In response, data 115 representing a predictive data model (or a derivation thereof) may be received into auxiliary query engine 105 to perform a function defined by the predictive data model.

Further to the example of processing the auxiliary query command, auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to identify data 111 a representing one or more datasets 132 of repository 130 based on the auxiliary query command. Moreover, auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to identify one or more parameters, which, in some examples, may identify subsets of dataset data 111 a with which to apply to a predictive data model to generate results. Each subset of dataset data 111 a identified by a parameter may relate to a type or data attribute of a dataset (e.g., associated with a column of data of a tabular data format), according to some examples. The resultant data may be stored as data 111 b within (or linked to) project data 134, and may be presented as query resultant data 184 in data project interface 180. In some examples, query resultant data 184 may be presented in tabular form, or in graphical form (e.g., in the form of a visualization, such as a bar chart, graph, etc.). In some implementations, a user input (not shown) may accompany query resultant data 184 to open a connector or implement an API to transmit the query results to a third-party (e.g., external) computerized data analysis tool, such as Tableau®. A query may be “ran,” or performed, by applying executable commands to a collaborative atomized dataset to generate results of the query in interface portion 194.

Diagram 100 depicts a user 107 being associated with a computing device 109, which may be configured to generate trained model data 122. As shown, computing device 190 may be configured to execute any number of applications to generate a predictive data model. For example, computing device 190 may include one or more analytic applications 112, one or more model generators 114, and one or more serializers 160, among other applications. One or more analytic applications 112 may include applications and/or programming languages configured to perform statistical and data analysis including “R,” which is maintained and controlled by “The R Foundation for Statistical Computing” at www(dot)r-project(dot)org, as well as other like languages or packages, including applications that may be integrated with R (e.g., such as MATLAB™, Mathematica™, etc.). Also, other applications, such as Python programming applications, MATLAB™, Tableau® applications, SAS® applications, etc., any of which may be used to perform further analysis, including visualization or other queries and data manipulation to develop, for example, machine learning applications.

One or more model generators 114 may include one or more applications configured to apply machine learning algorithms or deep learning algorithms to generate one or more predictive data models. For example, one or more model generators 114 may be configured to facilitate supervised as well as unsupervised learning, and any may be further configured to implement Bayesian models, support vector machine algorithms, neural network algorithms, linear regression algorithms, etc., as well as clustering algorithms, k-means algorithms, etc. In developing a predictive data model, one or more model generators 114 may be configured to train a model using data 113 b from datasets 132. Based on an amount of data in datasets 132 (e.g., from hundreds to millions of records, files, or subsets of data), an output (e.g., a value thereof) may be predicted based on any number of specific inputs, as parameters, into a data model. Subsequent to a training process, a trained data model 122 may be referred to a predictive data model.

In some examples, computing device 109 may include applications to provide one or more serializers 116, which may be configured to convert a predictive data model, such as trained data model 122, into a format that facilitates storage or data transmission. In some examples, serializer 116 may be configured to serialize trained model data 122 for transmission as data 115 to query engine 104. Examples of applications to implement serializers 116 include, but are not limited to, a Predictive Model Markup Language (“PMML”) application, which is developed and managed by the Data Mining Group (a consortium managed by the Center for Computational Science Research, Inc., of Ill., USA), an Open Neural Network Exchange format (“ONNX”) application, which is managed by the Linux® Foundation of San Francisco, Calif., USA, “pickle” application, which is a process of converted a Python object into a byte stream maintained by Python Software Foundation of Fredericksburg, Va., USA, and other equivalent serializing functions and/or applications. According to various examples, query engine 104 and/or collaborative data consolidation system 110 may be configured to implement one or more deserializers (not shown) configured to perform an operation to reconstitute a predictive data model based on the serialized predictive data model. For example, a deserializer may be configured to transform a serialized predictive data model into its original state by performing an inverse serialization process (e.g., reconstructing or extracting objects or other data structures from a stream of bytes or bits).

To generate an auxiliary query command as part of a query, user 107 may cause computing device 109 to receive a user input that, in turn, causes entry of an auxiliary query command into a query editor 185 of a workspace 194 portion of data project interface 180. Entry of an auxiliary query command may supplement entry of normative (e.g., standard) query commands. Therefore, entry of auxiliary queue commands facilitates entry of in situ (e.g., inline) referencing and implementation of output data of predicative data models automatically. Further, execution of an auxiliary query command may return a degree of confidence (e.g., a confidence level) for a value generated as an output of a predictive data model, the value representing a likelihood that, for example, a confidence interval covers or includes a proportion of a population of outcomes. Thus, a query command (e.g., an auxiliary query command) can be configured to return a confidence level or any other statistical representation that expresses an accuracy of a predicted output value from a predictive data model. In view of the foregoing, implementing and executing an auxiliary query command may automatically deploy predictive machine learning algorithm outputs during a query with negligible to no manual access to a predictive data model upon execution of a query, at least in some examples.

Query engine 104 and auxiliary query engine 105 may be configured to implement a query may be implemented as either a relational-based query (e.g., in an SQL-equivalent query language) or a graph-based query (e.g., in a SPARQL-equivalent query language). Further, a query may be implemented as either an implicit federated query or an explicit federated query. In some examples, a query is automatically performed, or run, each time a query is accessed, thereby providing, for example, a latest (or “freshest”) query result. As such, any number of users of an organization (e.g., an enterprise) may generate any number of queries that access a predictive data model while running the queries.

Data project controller 106 may be configured to control components of collaborative dataset consolidation system 110 to provision, for example, data project interface 180, as a computerized tool, to facilitate interoperability of canonical datasets with other datasets in different formats or with various external computerized analysis tools (e.g., via application programming interfaces, or APIs), whereby computerized analysis tools may be disposed external to collaborative dataset consolidation system 110. Examples of external computerized analysis tools include statistical and visualization applications. Thus, data project interface 180, as a computerized tool, may be configured to procure, inspect, analyze, generate, manipulate, and share datasets, as well as to share query results (e.g., based on auxiliary query commands) and insights (e.g., conclusions or subsidiary conclusions) among any number of collaborative computing systems (and collaborative users of system 110). In at least some examples, data project interface 180 facilitates simultaneous access to multiple computerized tools, whereby data project interface 180 is depicted in a non-limiting example as a unitary, single interface configured to minimize or negate disruptions due to transitioning to different tools that may otherwise infuse friction in a data project and associated analysis.

Data project interface 180 includes examples of interface portions, such as a project objective portion 181, insights portion 182, and an interactive collaborative activity feed portion 183. Project objective 181 may be configured to facilitate an aim for procuring, configuring, and assessing data for a particular data-driven purpose or objective. Insights 182 may include data representing visualized (e.g., graphical) or textual results as examples of analytic results (including interim results) for a data project. For example, insights 182 a may provide answers or conclusions, whether final or interim, in report form (e.g., a text file, PDF, etc.). Or, dataset/data project creator 107 may publish insight 182 b to provide different results of a query, perhaps in graphic form. Another user may generate another insight, such as insight 182 c. Interactive collaborative activity feed 183 communicates interactions over time with the datasets of a data project to collaborative users, include user 107.

Data project controller 106 may be configured to control functionality of data project interface 180 to enable personnel of different skill levels to engage with data operations of an enterprise. For example, consider a skillset of a user generating a data project that may begin, or “kick off,” with a formation of an objective at 130 of a data project with which to guide collaborative data mining and analyzation efforts. In some examples, a project objective may be established by a stakeholder, such as by management personnel of an organization, or any role or individual who may or may not be skilled as a data practitioner. For example, a chief executive officer (“CEO”) of a non-profit organization may desire to seek an answer to a technical question that the CEO is not readily able to resolve. The CEO may launch a data project through establishing a project objective 181 to invite skilled data practitioners within the organization, or external to the organization, to find a resolution of a question and/or proffered hypotheses. Further, auxiliary query command enables users of different roles and individual who may or may not be skilled as a data practitioner to have access to underlying, complex machine learning-based models with no need to require access to machine learning-specific applications or algorithms.

Collaboration manager 170 may be configured to monitor updates to dataset attributes and other changes to a data project, and to disseminate the updates, including queries integrating predicative data models in situ, to a community of networked users or participants. Therefore, users, such as user 107, as well as any other user or authorized participant, may receive communications, such as in an interactive collaborative activity feed 183 to discover new or recently-modified dataset-related information in real-time (or near real-time), including new or recently-modified queries that may deploy automatically a machine learning model concurrently (or nearly concurrently) with running a query. Interactive collaborative activity feed 183 also may provide information regarding collaborative interactions with one or more datasets associated with a data project, or with one or more collaborative users or computing devices. As an example, interactive collaborative activity feed 183 may convey one or more of a number of queries that are performed relative to a dataset, a number of dataset versions, identities of users (or associated user identifiers) who have analyzed a dataset, a number of user comments related to a dataset, the types of comments, etc.), and the like. Further, a generated insight may be published into data project interface 180, which, in turn, may cause a notification (i.e., an insight has been generated) may be transmitted via interactive collaborative activity feed 183 to associated collaborative user accounts to inform collaborative users of the availability of a newly-formed insight. Therefore, interactive collaborative activity feed 183 may provide for “a network for datasets” (e.g., a “social” network of datasets and dataset interactions). While “a network for datasets” need not be based on electronic social interactions among users, various examples provide for inclusion of users and user interactions (e.g., social network of data practitioners, etc.) to supplement the “network of datasets.”

Dataset ingestion controller 108 may be configured to transform, for example, a tabular data arrangement (or any other data format) in which a dataset may be introduced into collaborative dataset consolidation system 110 as another data arrangement (e.g., a graph data arrangement) in a second format (e.g., a graph). Examples of data formats of ingested data include CSV, XML, JSON, XLS, MySQL, binary, free-form, unstructured data formats (e.g., data extracted from a PDF file using optical character recognition), etc., among others. Dataset ingestion controller 108 also may be configured to perform other functionalities with which to form, modify, query and share collaborative datasets according to various examples. In at least some examples, dataset ingestion controller 108 and/or other components of collaborative dataset consolidation system 110 may be configured to implement linked data as one or more canonical datasets with which to modify, query, analyze, visualize, and the like. In some examples, dataset ingestion controller 108 may be configured to detect that an ingested set of data constitutes a predictive data model, and, in response, may store data models in repository 130.

According to some embodiments, a collaborative data format may be configured to, but need not be required to, format a converted dataset into an atomized dataset. An atomized dataset may include a data arrangement in which data is stored as an atomized data point that, for example, may be an irreducible or simplest data representation (e.g., a triple is a smallest irreducible representation for a binary relationship between two data units) that are linkable to other atomized data points, according to some embodiments. As atomized data points may be linked to each other, a data arrangement may be represented as a graph, whereby a converted dataset (i.e., an atomized dataset) may form a portion of a graph. In some cases, an atomized dataset facilitates merging of data irrespective of whether, for example, schemas or applications differ. Further, an atomized data point may represent a triple or any portion thereof (e.g., any data unit representing one of a subject, a predicate, or an object), according to at least some examples.

Note that an ingested dataset including a tabular data arrangement may be converted into a second data arrangement, such as a graph data arrangement. As such, data in a field (e.g., a unit of data in a cell at a row and column) of a table may be disposed in association with a node in a graph (e.g., a unit of data as linked data). A data operation (e.g., a query) may be applied as either a query against a tabular data arrangement (e.g., based on a relational data model) or graph data arrangement (e.g., based on a graph data model, such using RDF). Since equivalent data are disposed in both a field of a table and a node of a graph, either the table or the graph may be used interchangeably to perform queries and other data operations. Similarly, a dataset disposed in one or more other graph data arrangements may be disposed or otherwise mapped (e.g., linked) as a dataset into a tabular data arrangement. Further to diagram 100, dataset ingestion controller 108 may be configured to generate ancillary data or descriptor data (e.g., metadata) that describe attributes associated with each unit of data in the ingested dataset as metadata.

An atomized data point may be equivalent to a triple data point of the Resource Description Framework (“RDF”) data model and specification, according to some examples. Note that the term “atomized” may be used to describe a data point or a dataset composed of data points represented by a relatively small unit of data. As such, an “atomized” data point is not intended to be limited to a “triple” or to be compliant with RDF; further, an “atomized” dataset is not intended to be limited to RDF-based datasets or their variants. Also, an “atomized” data store is not intended to be limited to a “triplestore,” but these terms are intended to be broader to encompass other equivalent data representations. Examples of triplestores suitable to store “triples” and atomized datasets (or portions thereof) include, but are not limited to, any triplestore type architected to function as (or similar to) a BLAZEGRAPH triplestore, which is developed by Systap, LLC of Washington, D.C., U.S.A.), any triplestore type architected to function as (or similar to) a STARDOG triplestore, which is developed by Complexible, Inc. of Washington, D.C., U.S.A.), any triplestore type architected to function as (or similar to) a FUSEKI triplestore, which may be maintained by The Apache Software Foundation of Forest Hill, Md., U.S.A.), and the like.

According to various examples, query engine 104 and/or collaborative data consolidation system 110 may be configured to implement any of analytic applications 112, model generators 114, and serializers 160, among other applications. According to various examples, any of the functionalities and/or structures described in FIG. 1 may be implemented in, or in association with, collaborative dataset consolidation system 110. In at least one implementation, collaborative dataset consolidation system 110 may be implemented using a computing platform provided by data.world, Inc., of Austin, Tex., USA. In view of the foregoing, and in subsequent descriptions, data project interface 180 provides, in some examples, a unified view and an interface (e.g., a single interface) with which to access multiple functions, applications, data operations, and the like, for analyzing, querying, and publicizing multiple collaborative datasets, whereby an auxiliary query command may be implemented in situ. One or more elements depicted in diagram 100 of FIG. 1 may include structures and/or functions as similarly-named or similarly-numbered elements depicted in other drawings, or as otherwise described herein, in accordance with one or more examples.

According to various embodiments, one or more structural and/or functional elements described in FIG. 1, as well as below, may be implemented in hardware or software, or both. Examples of one or more structural and/or functional elements described herein may be implemented as set forth in one or more of U.S. Pat. No. 10,346,429, issued on Jul. 9, 2019, and titled “MANAGEMENT OF COLLABORATIVE DATASETS VIA DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER NETWORKS;” U.S. Pat. No. 10,353,911, issued on Jul. 16, 2019, and titled “COMPUTERIZED TOOLS TO DISCOVER, FORM, AND ANALYZE DATASET INTERRELATIONS AMONG A SYSTEM OF NETWORKED COLLABORATIVE DATASETS;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/927,006 filed on Mar. 20, 2018, and titled “AGGREGATION OF ANCILLARY DATA ASSOCIATED WITH SOURCE DATA IN A SYSTEM OF NETWORKED COLLABORATIVE DATASETS;” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/985,705, filed on May 22, 2018, and titled “DYNAMIC COMPOSITE DATA DICTIONARY TO FACILITATE DATA OPERATIONS VIA COMPUTERIZED TOOLS CONFIGURED TO ACCESS COLLABORATIVE DATASETS IN A NETWORKED COMPUTING PLATFORM,” all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

FIG. 2 is a diagram depicting an example of a stack configured to facilitate functionalities of an auxiliary query layer and a data project layer thereon, according to some examples. A network protocol 204, such as HTTP (or the like), may be layered upon a network layer 202, which may include IP-based networks and protocols or any other type of network. A triple data layer 206 is illustrative of an exemplary layer in the architecture of software stack 201 at which “atomic” triple data may been converted from the native programmatic and/or formatting language of a query or another query received by a query layer 201. Elements of query layer 201 may be configured to convert data associated with a query into RDF or other forms of “atomic” triples data. As used herein, “atomic” may refer to a common conversion data format that, once converted, can be used to create various types of queries for datasets stored on different, inconsistent, or incongruous databases. Some examples of types of triple formats and protocols that may be used to convert a query include, but are not limited to RDF, SPARQL, R, Spark, among others.

Connector layer 208 may be disposed on triple data layer 206, as shown in stack 201. Connector layer 208 may include instructions and data to implement a data network link connector (e.g., a connector, such as a web data connector), or an integration application including one or more application program interfaces (“APIs”) and/or one or more web connectors. Further, connector layer 208 may include a model extraction application 209 that may be configured to extract or otherwise acquire data representing predictive data model. As an example, connector layer 208 may include one or more applications configured to implement a serializer or a deserializer, or both.

Query layer 210, which may be disposed upon connector layer 208, can include executable instructions or commands to facilitate one or more query programming languages, such as a structured query language (“SQL”), a SPARQL protocol and RDF query language (“SPARQL”), and any other query programming language (or variant thereof). Auxiliary query layer 212 may include supplemental executable instructions or auxiliary commands to augment one or more query programming languages (e.g., augment one or more standard query programming languages). In at least one example, a class of auxiliary query commands may be configured to implement data representing a predictive data model inline as a query is performed.

Data project layer 214, which may be disposed upon auxiliary query layer 212, may include executable instructions or commands to implement a data project interface, as a computerized tool, that may be configured to procure, inspect, analyze, generate, manipulate, and share datasets. Collaborative activity notification application 215 may include an application configured to disseminate dataset interactions over a community of datasets and users. Also, collaborative activity notification application 215 may facilitate sharing query results (e.g., based on auxiliary query commands) and insights (e.g., conclusions or subsidiary conclusions), among other things, to any number of collaborative computing systems and associated users.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram depicting an example of implementing a query engine to deploy predictive data models in situ, according to some embodiments. In some examples, flow diagram 300 may be implemented via computerized tools including a data project interface, which may be configured to initiate and/or execute query instructions to evaluate a data project dataset by invoking application of a predictive data model inline to generating and executing query commands. A query engine implementing an auxiliary query engine, an example of which is depicted in FIG. 1, may be configured to effectuate an example flow of diagram 300. At 302, a query engine may be configured to receive data identified as model data, which may be include data representing a predictive data model. At 304, a subset of auxiliary instructions configured to supplement a set of instructions may be implemented, for example, by a query engine. In some cases, at least one auxiliary instruction (e.g., at least one auxiliary query command) may be configured to access model data as a predictive data model. At 306, data representing a request to perform a query may be received into, for example, a query engine, whereby the query may be configured to cause the query engine to access model data.

At 308, data representing serialized model data may be received or otherwise accessed. In some examples, serialized model data may include a format associated with a model data, whereby serialized model data may be a type of formatted model data. In some examples, a query engine may be configured to deserialize the serialized model data to reconstitute the model data prior to performing a query. Data representing serialized model data may be loaded into a query engine to which data from a dataset may be applied to perform a function inline with execution of an auxiliary query command. In some examples, a serialized model data may be loaded into a query engine responsive to an identifier determined by execution of the at least one auxiliary instruction.

At 310, a function associated with the serialized model data may be performed. Responsive to receiving a query request, one or more datasets with which to perform a function may be accessed. The one or more datasets may be disposed in one or more triple stores or other graph-based data repositories. In some examples, a function call responsive to a query may be performed to fetch data representing serialized model data. At 312, resultant data of a query may be generated based on a function. Performance of a query may generate resultant data based on an identifier that references the serialized model data. Further, generating resulting data at 312 may include receiving a query instruction, such as an auxiliary instruction, that includes one or more parameters and an identifier that references serialized model data. The one or more parameter may identify which of one or more datasets (or subsets thereof) stored in triple stores that may be accessed as inputs into a predictive data model to perform a function associated with an identifier. In some examples, executing instructions to generate resultant data may include applying a subset of one or more datasets (e.g., one or more columns) to inputs of a predictive data model (e.g., serialized model data subsequent to deserialization). The resultant data may be accessed at one or more outputs of the predictive data model. Additionally, data representing a degree of confidence associated with the resultant data may be generated.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram depicting an example of an auxiliary query command configured to process functionality of a predictive data model, according to some examples. Diagram 400 depicts a query engine 404 configured to exchange data with a data project interface 480 and a repository 430, according to the example shown. Query engine 404 is shown to include deserializer 403 and an auxiliary query engine 405, which in turn, may include a predictive model processor 409. According to various embodiments, one or more structural and/or functional elements described in FIG. 4, as well as below, may be implemented in hardware or software, or both. One or more elements depicted in diagram 400 of FIG. 4 may include structures and/or functions as similarly-named or similarly-numbered elements depicted in other drawings, or as otherwise described herein or incorporated by reference herein, in accordance with one or more examples.

A query may be entered into a field of a query editor 485. Consider that an auxiliary query command 401 may be entered into query editor 485, as an interface portion of a workspace 494. Standard or normative query commands 422, such as a SELECT statement, that are entered into a query may be validated by query engine 404 with respect to semantics, syntax, and other query language requirements. For example, a normative SELECT statement may be configured to retrieve zero or more rows from one or more database tables or database views. By contrast, an auxiliary query engine 405 may be configured to receive, validate, and process auxiliary query command 401, which may be a non-standard SELECT statement 411. In this example, SELECT statement 441 may include referential data configured to identify parameters (“parm”) 444 and an identifier of a predictive data model (“model”) 446. In some examples, parameters 444 may identify inputs and outputs of a model with which to apply data and return a result. For example, inputs as parameters may describe subsets of datasets (e.g., columns of datasets) and outputs as parameters may describe one or more subsets of the datasets to be added as resultant data (including confidence level data). For example, output data may be disposed in a new column, and associated degree of confidence level data may be disposed in a new column. Further, the FROM clause 447 may reference one or more datasets (“dataset”) 448 from which to extract input data for application to a predictive data model. Data source links 482 may include one or more links as references to datasets with which to select an identifier for dataset 448.

A query may be executed in response to receiving a user input caused by activation of an execute query input 492. To process the query, query engine 404 and auxiliary query engine 405 may receive query data, including query request data 419, which may include parametric data 419 a to identify input data, model identifier data 419 b may identify a specific predictive data model, and dataset identifier data 419 c may identify a specific dataset from which input data may be retrieved and resultant data may be associated. Auxiliary query engine 405 may use query request data 419 to request and receive predictive model data 415, which may be serialized. Deserializer 403 may be configured to reconstitute data 415 representing a serialized predictive data model into its original format or data structure. Auxiliary query engine 405 also may use dataset identifier data 419 c to identify dataset data 432 in a repository 430, and parametric data 419 a may be used to subsets of dataset data 411 that represents input data to be applied against a predictive data model. In some examples, predictive model data 415 may be loaded into computing memory accessible to auxiliary query engine 405.

Predictive model processor 409 may be configured to implement the identified predictive data model as a function, whereas subsets of dataset data 411 (e.g., selected columnar data) may be applied as inputs to the function. Parametric data 419 a may identify an output and associated values that may be monitored with respect to a degree of confidence. Resultant data 413 may be presented in data project interface 480, and may be stored in association with dataset data 432 (e.g., stored as links to a graph).

As an example, consider that dataset 432 includes data for an enterprise that may be disposed in numerous columns and rows of data (e.g., with data values as nodes in a graph). In query editor 485, input parameters include “LTV” and “Start Date,” and an output parameter includes a “Churn rate.” “LTV,” or customer lifetime value, represents a value representing an average revenue that a customer generates before they churn (i.e., cease patronizing a business), whereas “start date” represents an amount of time a customer has been patronizing a business. In this example, churn rate may be a binary value (e.g., yes or no) as to whether a specific customer is predicted to cease patronizing a business. Dataset data 432 may include LTV and Start date data, with which a machine learning algorithm may analyze, develop a data model, train the data model, and generate a predictive data model, which has been accessed as predictive model data 415. As such, predictive model processor 409 may be configured to predict whether a specific customer may churn out (e.g., stop patronizing a business) based on values LTV and Start date, as applied to the predictive data model. The resultant data representing the Churn rate may be stored in dataset data 432, as well as data representing a degree of confidence that the determined Churn rate is accurate.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram depicting an example of implementing an auxiliary query command to deploy predictive data models during query execution, according to some embodiments. In some examples, flow diagram 500 may be implemented via computerized tools including query editor, which may be configured to initiate and/or run a query to evaluate dataset data by applying a predictive data model inline to running a query. An auxiliary query engine, an example of which is depicted in FIG. 4, may be configured to effectuate an example flow of diagram 500. At 502, a query request may be detected.

At 504, data representing serialized model data that includes a format associated with a model data may be identified. In some cases, an auxiliary query command may be implemented responsive, for example, to entry of the auxiliary query command into a query editor. In some examples, an auxiliary query command may be compatible with a set of query commands of a query programming language. For example, an auxiliary query command may be compatible with (or may supplement) a structured query language (“SQL”), a SPARQL protocol and RDF query language (“SPARQL”), and the like. At 506, user inputs may be presented at or to a user interface configured to perform a query in association with to a query request. At 508, query data referencing parameters, a dataset, and a predictive data model may be received.

At 510, a query may be executed, or ran, based on query data. In some examples, one or more memory repositories may be accessed to load dataset data and predictive data model into computational memory to execute a function associated with the predictive data model. For example, either dataset data or predictive data model data, or both, may be accessed in one or more triplestore databases, or other graph-based data stores. Subsets of dataset data may be extracted in accordance to values of the parameters, which, in turn, may be applied to inputs of a predictive data model to execute a function. Resultant data at outputs of the predictive data model may be generated, include one or more degrees of confidence for each result. Further to 510, presentation of a field in which to receive a query command (e.g., to either enter a query into a query editor or run a query) may be presented in a user interface. In at last one example, a user interface may include a data project user interface.

At 512, resultant data may be identified. The resultant data may include data representing a degree of confidence relative to a predictive data model used to determine the resultant data. In some examples, a degree of confidence may be generated for each result outputted from, for example, a predictive data model. In some examples, subsets of resultant data and corresponding data representing degrees of confidence may be formatted and presented in tabular data format (e.g., within a data project interface). In some cases, resultant data and degrees of confidence data may be disposed in a first and second column, respectively.

FIG. 6 is a diagram depicting a collaborative dataset consolidation system including a data stream converter to facilitate implementation of an auxiliary query command by multiple collaborative computing systems, according to some examples. Diagram 600 depicts a collaborative dataset consolidation system 610 including a data repository 612, which includes user account data 613 a associated with either a user 608 a or a computing device 609 a, or both, and account data and 613 b associated with either a user 608 b or a computing device 609 b, or both. User account data 613 a may identify user 608 a and/or computing device 609 a as creators, or “owners,” of a dataset or data project accessible by a number of collaborative users 608 b to 608 n and a number of collaborative computing devices 609 b to 609 n, any of which may be granted access via an account manager 611 (based on user account data 613 a, 613 b, . . . , and 613 n, which is not shown) to access a dataset, create a modified dataset based on the dataset, create an insight (e.g., visualization), and perform queries using auxiliary query commands, or data operations, depending on permission data. Repository 612 also includes dataset data 632 and project data arrangement 634, which is a data arrangement including references or links to data that constitute a data project, which may be accessible at data project interface 690.

Collaborative dataset consolidation system 610 may also include a data project controller 615, a collaboration manager 614, and a query engine 604, which, in turn, may also include an auxiliary query engine 605. One or more elements depicted in diagram 600 of FIG. 6 may include structures and/or functions as similarly-named or similarly-numbered elements depicted in other drawings, or as otherwise described herein, in accordance with one or more examples.

Collaborative dataset consolidation system 610 may also include a data stream converters 619 a and 619 b. In one example, data stream converter 619 a may be implemented as a serializer and/or a deserializer to operate on predictive data model data 661. In another example, data stream converter 619 b may be configured to invoke or implement an applications programming interface, or API, a connectors (e.g., a data network link connector or a web data connector), and/or integration applications (e.g., one or more APIs and one or more data connectors) to access data 662 and 666 via a network with an external third-party computerized data analysis tool 680, such as a Tableau® application.

To continue with the example shown in FIG. 6, consider that user 608 a may perform a query including an auxiliary query command via computing device 609 a at collaborative dataset consolidation system 610, which may generate a notification via an interactive collaborative activity feed 699, whereby any of a number of collaborative enterprise users 608 b to 608 n and any of a number of collaborative enterprise computing devices 609 b to 609 n may receive a notification that newly-formed query results are available via activity feed data 699. As such, a qualified collaborator, such as computing device 609 b, may generate a query request 662 via a network to access a dataset 632 responsive to receiving the notification of the newly-formed query results. In some examples, either collaborative user 608 b or collaborative computing device 609 b may be configured to access third-party computerized data analysis tool 680 to review, modify, query, or generate an insight 692 via user account data 613 a and 613 b. In some examples, either collaborative user 608 b or collaborative computing device 609 b need not have credentials, and need not be authorized to access external third-party computerized data analysis tool 680. However, either collaborative user 608 b or collaborative computing device 609 b may access external third-party computerized data analysis tool 680 via authorized user account data 613 a via account manager 611 to generate, for example, a query using an auxiliary query command to establish a modified insight 699, or to perform any other data operation.

Therefore, a collaborative user 608 b may also generate a query implementing an auxiliary query command, whereby the query may access a predictive data model in situ to provide a supplement dataset 632 with data, which, in turn, generates data 663 as insight 692 in data project interface 690. Thus, auxiliary query engine 605 enables users of different skill sets, roles, and experience levels, to collaboratively use enterprise data. Collaboration among users via collaborative user accounts (e.g., data representing user accounts for accessing a collaborative dataset consolidation system) and formation of collaborative datasets therefore may expedite analysis of data to drive toward resolution or confirmation of a hypothesis based on up-to-date information provided by an interactive collaborative activity feed.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting an example of implementing an auxiliary query command collaboratively to redeploy predictive data models during requests to run queries, according to some embodiments. In some examples, flow diagram 700 may be implemented via a user interface to initiate and/or run multiple queries originating from multiple users (or user accounts) using a predictive data model in situ to developing or running a query. One or more structures and/or functionalities of FIG. 6 may be configured to implement a flow of diagram 700.

At 702, data from a collaborative dataset platform may be transmitted to a computing device configured to generate and/or train model data (e.g., a predictive data model). The computing device may be disposed externally to a collaborative dataset platform, and may be associated with data representing a user account (e.g., a first user account). In some examples, transmission of the data may be transmitted via, for example, a data network link connector (e.g., a connector, such as a web data connector), or an integration application including one or more application program interfaces (“APIs”) and/or one or more web connectors.

At 704, a query engine may be activated responsive to a query request to execute an instruction. The query request may include data identifying one or more parameters, a dataset stored in memory at the collaborative dataset platform, and a data model.

At 706, serialized model data may be received as a serialized version of a data model. Serialized model data may be derived from data representing a machine learning algorithm. In some examples, a request to fetch serialization model data (e.g., responsive to running a query) may be transmitted via, for example, a data network link connector (e.g., a connector, such as a web data connector), or an integration application including one or more application program interfaces (“APIs”) and/or one or more web connectors. Also, a data network link may be configured to receive a type of formatting used to serialize (and deserialize) predictive model data.

At 708, a subset of the dataset may be applied to, for example, a predictive model based on one or more parameters to perform a function. In some instances, serialized model data may be deserialize to provide (e.g., reconstitute) the data model at a query engine.

At 710, resultant data of a query request may be generated based the function. In some examples, resultant data may be generated at outputs of a data model, including data representing a degree of confidence. The degree of confidence may be presented in a data project interface. Further to 710, generation of resultant data may be detected, and, in response, a subset of collaborative computing devices (or user accounts) linked to a project data arrangement may be identified. Subsequently, an electronic notification may be generated for transmission via, for example, an activity feed to the subset of collaborative computing devices.

At 712, resultant data may be stored in a repository linked to a project data arrangement that includes project-related data including a query request and its results. In some examples, access to resultant data may be facilitated by a second computing device (e.g., associated with a second user account). Further, a query engine may be activated to perform another query. A subsequent query may include data identifying at least one parameter, a dataset, and a predicted data model, whereby a request to fetch serialized model data may be transmitted. The query, in turn, may generate other resultant data based a function of data model. In one example, a first computing device (e.g., associated with a first user account) and a second computing device (e.g., associated with the second user account) may be associated with enterprise-related data of an enterprise.

FIG. 8 illustrates examples of various computing platforms configured to provide various functionalities to any of one or more components of a collaborative dataset consolidation system, according to various embodiments. In some examples, computing platform 800 may be used to implement computer programs, applications, methods, processes, algorithms, or other software, as well as any hardware implementation thereof, to perform the above-described techniques.

In some cases, computing platform 800 or any portion (e.g., any structural or functional portion) can be disposed in, or distributed among, any device, such as a computing device 890 a, mobile computing device 890 b, and/or a processing circuit in association with initiating the formation of collaborative datasets, as well as analyzing datasets via user interfaces and user interface elements, according to various examples described herein.

Computing platform 800 includes a bus 802 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, which interconnects subsystems and devices, such as processor 804, system memory 806 (e.g., RAM, etc.), storage device 808 (e.g., ROM, etc.), an in-memory cache (which may be implemented in RAM 806 or other portions of computing platform 800), a communication interface 813 (e.g., an Ethernet or wireless controller, a Bluetooth controller, NFC logic, etc.) to facilitate communications via a port on communication link 821 to communicate, for example, with a computing device, including mobile computing and/or communication devices with processors, including database devices (e.g., storage devices configured to store atomized datasets, including, but not limited to triplestores, etc.). Processor 804 can be implemented as one or more graphics processing units (“GPUs”), as one or more central processing units (“CPUs”), such as those manufactured by Intel® Corporation, or as one or more virtual processors, as well as any combination of CPUs and virtual processors. Computing platform 800 exchanges data representing inputs and outputs via input-and-output devices 801, including, but not limited to, keyboards, mice, audio inputs (e.g., speech-to-text driven devices), user interfaces, displays, monitors, cursors, touch-sensitive displays, LCD, LED, or OLED displays, and other I/O-related devices.

Note that in some examples, input-and-output devices 801 may be implemented as, or otherwise substituted with, a user interface in a computing device associated with a user account identifier in accordance with the various examples described herein.

According to some examples, computing platform 800 performs specific operations by processor 804 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions stored in system memory 806, and computing platform 800 can be implemented in a client-server arrangement, peer-to-peer arrangement, or as any mobile computing device, including smart phones and the like. Such instructions or data may be read into system memory 806 from another computer readable medium, such as storage device 808. In some examples, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions for implementation. Instructions may be embedded in software or firmware. The term “computer readable medium” refers to any tangible medium that participates in providing instructions to processor 804 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media and volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks and the like. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as system memory 806.

Known forms of computer readable media includes, for example, floppy disk, flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, RAM, PROM, EPROM, FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, or any other medium from which a computer can access data. Instructions may further be transmitted or received using a transmission medium. The term “transmission medium” may include any tangible or intangible medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying instructions for execution by the machine, and includes digital or analog communications signals or other intangible medium to facilitate communication of such instructions. Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including wires that comprise bus 802 for transmitting a computer data signal.

In some examples, execution of the sequences of instructions may be performed by computing platform 800. According to some examples, computing platform 800 can be coupled by communication link 821 (e.g., a wired network, such as LAN, PSTN, or any wireless network, including WiFi of various standards and protocols, Bluetooth®, NFC, Zig-Bee, etc.) to any other processor to perform the sequence of instructions in coordination with (or asynchronous to) one another. Computing platform 800 may transmit and receive messages, data, and instructions, including program code (e.g., application code) through communication link 821 and communication interface 813. Received program code may be executed by processor 804 as it is received, and/or stored in memory 806 or other non-volatile storage for later execution.

In the example shown, system memory 806 can include various modules that include executable instructions to implement functionalities described herein. System memory 806 may include an operating system (“O/S”) 832, as well as an application 836 and/or logic module(s) 859. In the example shown in FIG. 8, system memory 806 may include any number of modules 859, any of which, or one or more portions of which, can be configured to facilitate any one or more components of a computing system (e.g., a client computing system, a server computing system, etc.) by implementing one or more functions described herein.

The structures and/or functions of any of the above-described features can be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, circuitry, or a combination thereof. Note that the structures and constituent elements above, as well as their functionality, may be aggregated with one or more other structures or elements. Alternatively, the elements and their functionality may be subdivided into constituent sub-elements, if any. As software, the above-described techniques may be implemented using various types of programming or formatting languages, frameworks, syntax, applications, protocols, objects, or techniques. As hardware and/or firmware, the above-described techniques may be implemented using various types of programming or integrated circuit design languages, including hardware description languages, such as any register transfer language (“RTL”) configured to design field-programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), application-specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”), or any other type of integrated circuit. According to some embodiments, the term “module” can refer, for example, to an algorithm or a portion thereof, and/or logic implemented in either hardware circuitry or software, or a combination thereof. These can be varied and are not limited to the examples or descriptions provided.

In some embodiments, modules 859 of FIG. 8, or one or more of their components, or any process or device described herein, can be in communication (e.g., wired or wirelessly) with a mobile device, such as a mobile phone or computing device, or can be disposed therein.

In some cases, a mobile device, or any networked computing device (not shown) in communication with one or more modules 859 or one or more of its/their components (or any process or device described herein), can provide at least some of the structures and/or functions of any of the features described herein. As depicted in the above-described figures, the structures and/or functions of any of the above-described features can be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, circuitry, or any combination thereof. Note that the structures and constituent elements above, as well as their functionality, may be aggregated or combined with one or more other structures or elements. Alternatively, the elements and their functionality may be subdivided into constituent sub-elements, if any. As software, at least some of the above-described techniques may be implemented using various types of programming or formatting languages, frameworks, syntax, applications, protocols, objects, or techniques. For example, at least one of the elements depicted in any of the figures can represent one or more algorithms. Or, at least one of the elements can represent a portion of logic including a portion of hardware configured to provide constituent structures and/or functionalities.

For example, modules 859 or one or more of its/their components, or any process or device described herein, can be implemented in one or more computing devices (i.e., any mobile computing device, such as a wearable device, such as a hat or headband, or mobile phone, whether worn or carried) that include one or more processors configured to execute one or more algorithms in memory. Thus, at least some of the elements in the above-described figures can represent one or more algorithms. Or, at least one of the elements can represent a portion of logic including a portion of hardware configured to provide constituent structures and/or functionalities. These can be varied and are not limited to the examples or descriptions provided.

As hardware and/or firmware, the above-described structures and techniques can be implemented using various types of programming or integrated circuit design languages, including hardware description languages, such as any register transfer language (“RTL”) configured to design field-programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), application-specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”), multi-chip modules, or any other type of integrated circuit.

For example, modules 859 or one or more of its/their components, or any process or device described herein, can be implemented in one or more computing devices that include one or more circuits. Thus, at least one of the elements in the above-described figures can represent one or more components of hardware. Or, at least one of the elements can represent a portion of logic including a portion of a circuit configured to provide constituent structures and/or functionalities.

According to some embodiments, the term “circuit” can refer, for example, to any system including a number of components through which current flows to perform one or more functions, the components including discrete and complex components. Examples of discrete components include transistors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, diodes, and the like, and examples of complex components include memory, processors, analog circuits, digital circuits, and the like, including field-programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), application-specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”). Therefore, a circuit can include a system of electronic components and logic components (e.g., logic configured to execute instructions, such that a group of executable instructions of an algorithm, for example, and, thus, is a component of a circuit). According to some embodiments, the term “module” can refer, for example, to an algorithm or a portion thereof, and/or logic implemented in either hardware circuitry or software, or a combination thereof (i.e., a module can be implemented as a circuit). In some embodiments, algorithms and/or the memory in which the algorithms are stored are “components” of a circuit. Thus, the term “circuit” can also refer, for example, to a system of components, including algorithms. These can be varied and are not limited to the examples or descriptions provided. Further, none of the above-described implementations are abstract, but rather contribute significantly to improvements to functionalities and the art of computing devices.

As used herein, “system” may refer to or include the description of a computer, network, or distributed computing system, topology, or architecture using various computing resources that are configured to provide computing features, functions, processes, elements, components, or parts, without any particular limitation as to the type, make, manufacturer, developer, provider, configuration, programming or formatting language, service, class, resource, specification, protocol, or other computing or network attributes. As used herein, “software” or “application” may also be used interchangeably or synonymously with, or refer to a computer program, software, program, firmware, or any other term (e.g., engine) that may be used to describe, reference, or refer to a logical set of instructions that, when executed, performs a function or set of functions within a computing system or machine, regardless of whether physical, logical, or virtual and without restriction or limitation to any particular implementation, design, configuration, instance, or state. Further, “platform” may refer to any type of computer hardware (hereafter “hardware”) or software, or any combination thereof, that may use one or more local, remote, distributed, networked, or computing cloud (hereafter “cloud”)-based computing resources (e.g., computers, clients, servers, tablets, notebooks, smart phones, cell phones, mobile computing platforms or tablets, and the like) to provide an application, operating system, or other computing environment, such as those described herein, without restriction or limitation to any particular implementation, design, configuration, instance, or state. Distributed resources such as cloud computing networks (also referred to interchangeably as “computing clouds,” “storage clouds,” “cloud networks,” or, simply, “clouds,” without restriction or limitation to any particular implementation, design, configuration, instance, or state) may be used for processing and/or storage of varying quantities, types, structures, and formats of data, without restriction or limitation to any particular implementation, design, or configuration.

As used herein, data may be stored in various types of data structures including, but not limited to databases, data repositories, data warehouses, data stores, or other data structures configured to store data in various computer programming languages and formats in accordance with various types of structured and unstructured database schemas such as SQL, SPARQL, MySQL, NoSQL, DynamoDB™, etc. Also applicable are computer programming languages and formats similar or equivalent to those developed by data facility and computing providers such as Amazon® Web Services, Inc. of Seattle, Wash., FMP, Oracle®, Salesforce.com, Inc., or others, without limitation or restriction to any particular instance or implementation. DynamoDB™, Amazon Elasticsearch Service, Amazon Kinesis Data Streams (“KDS”)™, Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics, and the like, are examples of suitable technologies provide by Amazon Web Services (“AWS”).

Further, references to databases, data structures, or any type of data storage facility may include any embodiment as a local, remote, distributed, networked, cloud-based, or combined implementation thereof. For example, social networks and social media (hereafter “social media”) using different types of devices may generate (i.e., in the form of posts (which is to be distinguished from a POST request or call over HTTP) on social networks and social media) data in different forms, formats, layouts, data transfer protocols, and data storage schema for presentation on different types of devices that use, modify, or store data for purposes such as electronic messaging, audio or video rendering, content sharing, or like purposes. Data may be generated in various formats such as text, audio, video (including three dimensional, augmented reality (“AR”), and virtual reality (“VR”), or others, without limitation, for use on social networks, social media, and social applications (hereafter “social media”) such as Twitter® of San Francisco, Calif., Snapchat® as developed by Snap® of Venice, Calif., Messenger as developed by Facebook®, WhatsApp®, or Instagram® of Menlo Park, Calif., Pinterest® of San Francisco, Calif., LinkedIn® of Mountain View, Calif., and others, without limitation or restriction.

In some examples, data may be formatted and transmitted (i.e., transferred over one or more data communication protocols) between computing resources using various types of data communication and transfer protocols such as Hypertext Transfer Protocol (“HTTP”), Transmission Control Protocol (“TCP”)/Internet Protocol (“IP”), Internet Relay Chat (“IRC”), SMS, text messaging, instant messaging (“IM”), File Transfer Protocol (“FTP”), or others, without limitation. As described herein, disclosed processes implemented as software may be programmed using Java®, JavaScript®, Scala, Python™, XML, HTML, and other data formats and programs, without limitation. Disclosed processes herein may also implement software such as Streaming SQL applications, browser applications (e.g., Firefox™) and/or web applications, among others. In some example, a browser application may implement a JavaScript framework, such as Ember.js, Meteor.js, ExtJS, AngularJS, and the like. References to various layers of an application architecture (e.g., application layer or data layer) may refer to a stacked layer application architecture such as the Open Systems Interconnect (“OSI”) model or others.

Although the foregoing examples have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the above-described inventive techniques are not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the above-described invention techniques. The disclosed examples are illustrative and not restrictive. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: detecting a query request; identifying data representing serialized model data that includes a format associated with a model data; causing presentation of user inputs to a user interface configured to perform a query responsive in association with the query request; receiving query data referencing parameters, a dataset, and a predictive data model; executing a query based on the query associated with data configured to access at least a portion of a graph data arrangement being formatted in a triple-based data format; and identifying resultant data including data representing a degree of confidence relative to the predictive data model used to determine the resultant data.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: accessing one or more memory repositories to load the dataset data and the predictive data model into computational memory to execute a function associated with the predictive data model.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein accessing the one or more memory repositories comprises: accessing one or more triplestore databases.
 4. The method of claim 2, further comprising: extracting subsets of the dataset data in accordance to the parameters; and applying the subset of the dataset data to inputs of the predictive data model to execute the function.
 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising: generating the resultant data at outputs of the predictive data model; and generating the data representing the degree of confidence for each result.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: formatting subsets of the resultant data and corresponding data representing degrees of confidence in tabular data format; and causing presentation of the tabular data format at the user interface.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein causing the presentation of the user inputs comprises: implementing an auxiliary query command.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein executing the query comprises: causing presentation of a field in which to receive a query command.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the query command is a structured query language (“SQL”) statement.
 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the query command is a SPARQL protocol and RDF query language (“SPARQL”) statement.
 11. An apparatus comprising: a memory including executable instructions; and a processor, responsive to executing the instructions, is configured to: detect a query request; receive data representing serialized model data that includes a format associated with a model data; cause presentation of user inputs to a user interface configured to perform a query in association with the query request; receive query data referencing parameters, a dataset, and a predictive data model; execute a query based on the query data associated with data configured to access at least a portion of a graph data arrangement being formatted in a triple-based data format; and identify resultant data including data representing a degree of confidence relative to the predictive data model used to determine the resultant data.
 12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein a subset of the instructions further causes the processor to: access one or more memory repositories to load the dataset data and the predictive data model into computational memory to execute a function associated with the predictive data model.
 13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein a subset of the instructions further causes the processor to: access one or more triplestore databases.
 14. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein a subset of the instructions further causes the processor to: extract subsets of the dataset data in accordance to the parameters; and apply the subset of the dataset data to inputs of the predictive data model to execute the function.
 15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein a subset of the instructions further causes the processor to: generate the resultant data at outputs of the predictive data model; and generate the data representing the degree of confidence for each result.
 16. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein a subset of the instructions further causes the processor to: format subsets of the resultant data and corresponding data representing degrees of confidence in tabular data format; and cause presentation of the tabular data format at the user interface.
 17. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein a subset of the instructions further causes the processor to: implement an auxiliary query command.
 18. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein a subset of the instructions further causes the processor to: cause presentation of a field in which to receive a query command.
 19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the query command is a structured query language (“SQL”) statement.
 20. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the query command is a SPARQL protocol and RDF query language (“SPARQL”) statement. 